Why fair use is a case-by-case legal defence, not a label you can attach to a video.
Many creators hope that writing "fair use" in a description will protect a video. It does not. This article is general information and not legal advice; fair use and similar exceptions differ between countries, and some places have no such doctrine at all.
Fair use, where it exists, is a legal defence. It is not a tag, a setting or a permission. It is judged by a court or decision-maker, case by case, after a use has been challenged. Nobody can tell you in advance, with certainty, that your video is covered.
Assessments generally look at questions such as:
No single question settles it, and there is no safe length or percentage. Short does not mean allowed.
Some common beliefs, set against reality:
| Common belief | Reality | |
|---|---|---|
| A label | A tag in the description protects me | A defence judged case by case |
| Credit | Naming the owner helps | Credit is not the question |
| Short clips | Short means allowed | No safe length exists |
| Claims | Mentioning it cancels a claim | It does not release a claim |
Related lessons: Copyright basics and Reused content.
Platform processes and consequences are set by YouTube and can change. Read the current official page before you act.